(see other posts here & here) which is not totally out of left field because a) I have an interest in the subject. b) October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month. c) In light of current events affecting Jennifer Hudson’s family, it’s apropos.
You could probably file this entry under “duh,” but although it is seemingly obvious that certain bruises and cuts might be more visible on white/light skin as opposed to black/dark skin, this “discovery” could be important to how investigations are conducted. I’m just going to link this article and let it speak for itself.
Rape injuries harder to spot in dark-skinned women
Sexual-assault injuries may be tougher to detect in darker-skinned women — potentially putting them at a disadvantage in both the health and legal systems, according to researchers.
In a study of women who voluntarily underwent forensic exams after consensual sex, the researchers found that white women were significantly more likely than black women to have injuries to the external genitalia detected.There were no such differences, however, when it came to more internal injuries.
When the researchers analyzed the findings in terms of the women’s skin tone, they found that dark skin — more so than race, per se — appeared to reduce the likelihood of finding an injury to the external genitals.
“This finding is novel and important with respect both to clinical assessment and the decisions made within the criminal justice process,” lead researcher Dr. Marilyn S. Sommers, of the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, said in a statement issued by the university.
“Practitioners,” she added, “need to increase their vigilance when examining individuals with dark skin to ensure all injuries are identified, treated, and documented.”
The study included 120 healthy women who volunteered to undergo a forensic exam within 24 hours of having consensual sex. The exams looked for evidence of sexual assault, such as tearing, redness, abrasions and bruising.
Overall, Sommers and her colleagues found, the examiners identified such injuries in white women 68 percent of the time, but only 43 percent of the time in black women.
With other factors taken into account — such as age and use of condoms — white women were three times as likely as African Americans to have a genital injury detected.
The findings, they say, call for improvements in forensic-exam techniques that will reduce any racial disparities. (SOURCE: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, November 2008)
Thoughts?
This is kinda bugged out…
I’m nothing close to a doctor, but aren’t they supposed to thoroughly examine the patient under the best lighting possible, just so they can spot such things?
Not even just through visual signs, but by asking the patient if there’s any discomfort when touched in a certain spot? (If they’re cooperative, that is…)
I guess you gotta consider all the variables…
hy, Give something for help those hungry people from Africa and India,
I created this blog about this subject:
at http://tinyurl.com/5pul7l
This is bugged out but kind of expected. I dont think this is a rascist thing but it definitely is a racial thing. I feel that doctors are very rarely as thorough as they should be. Its hard to miss those bruises on the pink toes I guess….