Is anyone else uncomfortable with the way the media (traditional and new) has handled the question of Caster Semenya’s sex and femininity? When I first saw that Semenya was being tested to verify that she was a woman, ¼ of my mind understood the need to make sure athletic competitions are fair and that competitions exclusively reserved for women can’t be infiltrated by a male ringer but ¾ of me was more concerned about the message in between the lines. When everyone was saying Semenya looked like a man, weren’t they just saying she wasn’t conventionally attractive or that there’s a certain way for a woman to look – not like that?
It was inevitable, I suppose, but South Africa’s YOU Magazine has swooped down on Semenya like a hawk to make her look “pretty”, aka more like a woman ought to look. “Muthafucka for WHAT?” © Steve Harvey. Did we really need a “new and improved” version of Semenya as though something was wrong with her before? YOU is just trying to place Semenya in a pretty little box. A little makeup, a dress, earrings and a new hairdo then BAM! You’re a lady! I’m like, kind of insulted by it all.
When it all boils down to it, Semenya was being asked to prove herself female because she wasn’t cute. I know I might be simplifying it too much but that’s sort of the point. Instead of being rewarded for years of hard work and training (which, along with genetics, likely contributed to her muscular body and features), she was being criticized. Continue reading